I wrote something to update the extended properties metadata for a table in SQL Server (I forget the version, but something like 2017). To do this, I call the sp_AddExtendedProperty
with these parameters:
Now, this all works. I know it works because these often don't change (the metadata very rarely changes), so the first thing I do is read any existing metadata and compare it to what it should be, updating as needed. By doing this, and stepping through the code, I see that the metadata is correctly being stored. The thing is, I can't find it.
My understanding was that I could go into SSMS, look at the Properties for a table, then look at Extended Properties, and there it would be, with the name field holding OWNERS, and the value field holding whatever is in ownString. However, when I go and look there...it's empty. There are no extended properties at all, even though when I get the OWNERS property back from the table, I get back exactly what I am expecting.
So, it's being stored somewhere, but where? Am I doing it wrong? It's working, so it can't be all THAT wrong, but it should be visible and it is not.
with these parameters:
Code:
cmd.Parameters("@name").Value = "OWNERS"
cmd.Parameters("@value").Value = ownString
cmd.Parameters("@level0type").Value = "SCHEMA"
cmd.Parameters("@level0name").Value = [Enum].GetName(GetType(HISInCommon.Schema), tableHold.DBSchema)
cmd.Parameters("@level1type").Value = "TABLE"
cmd.Parameters("@level1name").Value = tableHold.TableNameBaseMy understanding was that I could go into SSMS, look at the Properties for a table, then look at Extended Properties, and there it would be, with the name field holding OWNERS, and the value field holding whatever is in ownString. However, when I go and look there...it's empty. There are no extended properties at all, even though when I get the OWNERS property back from the table, I get back exactly what I am expecting.
So, it's being stored somewhere, but where? Am I doing it wrong? It's working, so it can't be all THAT wrong, but it should be visible and it is not.